• From: Lisa Rein <lisarein@f...>
• To: "xml-dev@i..." <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 16:14:14 -0700

Hello,

A friend of mine asked me a question I didn't feel like I gave him a
good enough answer for, so I bring it to you...


say we have a part of a document below (probably a part of a very long
document).  Yes i KNOW this is misnested.  this is the point.  he was
saying that this kind of context couldn't be represented using a
well-formed structure:

<realestate>
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
<newyork>
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
</realestate>

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
</new york>

where the two paragraphs in the middle are "realestate:newyork", but
only if they are taken together.


No matter how I represented the structure above in a well-formed manner,
I couldn't quite pull off the "only when taken together" part.

Any suggestions?

thanks,

lisa


http://www.finetuning.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: question for a friend
    • From: Robin Cover <robin@i...>

• Prev by Date: XML Schema errata (and digest question)
• Next by Date: RE: question for a friend
• Previous by thread: XML Schema errata (and digest question)
• Next by thread: Re: question for a friend
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread