• From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 21:15:26 -0700

Looks generally good to me.  There is not yet a settled solution to local
scoping of element names in the schema proposals, so you must either wait,
use attributes, or hope that no clashes occur in your databases.  You should
also be aware that the working draft has no guarantees of stability. 

Regarding the specific datatypes you define, you show min and max values in
some cases, and in those you include formats that might cause trouble:
"1.7E308" might be better as "1.7E+308" and the several that have commas in
them would face fewer internationalization problems if you omit the commas.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Next by Date: 2 questions about XML validating parsers.
• Previous by thread: schema output for critique
• Next by thread: 2 questions about XML validating parsers.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread