• From: "Heikki Toivonen" <heikki@c...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 09:51:08 +0300

> Your announcement is specifically addressed to 95/98 users as well as
> NT/Linux, but the installer pops up an *extremely* strongly worded warning
> to the effect that it would be extremely foolish to go ahead with the
> install on 95/98.
>
> What's your recommendation for us 95/98 users?

The only problem (although a bad one!) I know of that is specific to
Win95/98 are images on your own HD (or maybe LAN disk as well). So for
example if you install DocZilla and try the demos from your HD the images
come up *extremely* slow. If you try the *exact* same demos on our website
there is no such problems.

--
  Heikki Toivonen
  http://www.doczilla.com
  http://www.citec.fi


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: DocZilla Alpha 2 for WinNT/95/98 and Linux
    • From: Michael.Orr@D...

• Prev by Date: XML parser problem related to Steven Holzner's code in XML Complete
• Next by Date: RE: XHTML DTDs failing in IE5
• Previous by thread: RE: DocZilla Alpha 2 for WinNT/95/98 and Linux
• Next by thread: Re: In cont. of & in element
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread