• From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 18:34:36 +0100

Brandt Dainow wrote:
> I think IE5 is correct.  I saw the same problem with some 
> DTD's from W3C.
> My understanding is that #FIXED should preceed a specific 
> value described in
> chars.  Isn't that what a xmlns always contains?

I think I agree, Brandt. However, the DTDs for XHTML simply have xmlns
as a URI that is required, but only say what that namespace is in the
comments. Nowhere is it actually 'defined'.

It's annoying because if I remove the DOCTYPE declaration to get past
the parser, then I lose the ability to use ' ' and such-like.

Thanks for your reply,

Mark

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XHTML DTDs failing in IE5
    • From: Toby Speight <tms@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: & in the element
• Next by Date: Re: In cont. of & in element
• Previous by thread: Re: XHTML DTDs failing in IE5
• Next by thread: Re: XHTML DTDs failing in IE5
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread