• From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>
• To: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 22:51:20 +0200

Paul Prescod wrote:
> 
> Chris Lilley wrote:
> >
> > > It strikes me as clearly poor design to use an HTTP url for something not
> > > retrievable by the HTTP protocol.
> >
> > It would be, but no such examples were given.
> 
> The XSL namespace is:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/XSL/Transform/1.0
> 
> Is someone going to put something retrievable there?

Why should something retrievable be put there? It functions just fine as
a unique name without having to retrieve anything.

--
Chris


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: "WorldNet" <csgallagher@w...>
  • Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>
  • Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSL Debate, Leventhal responds to Stephen Deach
• Next by Date: Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Previous by thread: Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Next by thread: Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread