• From: Charlie Kaiman <ckaiman@i...>
• To: "xml-dev@i..." <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 09:45:55 -0400

I received some good insight into this just yesterday:

[Which you should use depends upon] when you need it and what you need it 
to do.  If you need to reach the most parsers, and are willing to give up 
datatypes and
namespace support, use DTDs.  We are recommending that many of our clients 
use XML-Data Reduced, as documented at 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/xml/XMLGuide/schema-overview.asp because this 
gives you datatypes and namespace support, though this is currently 
supported only in shipping Microsoft and Datachannel parsers.  If you can 
wait six months to a year, the W3C is working on a new schema language that 
may or may not be similar to XML-Data Reduced.

Hope that helps you.

Charlie Kaiman
http://www.i3solutions.com/quote.asp

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: IE4 & XML
• Next by Date: Re: X-Schema
• Previous by thread: RE: X-Schema
• Next by thread: Re: X-Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread