Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Paul Prescod writes:
> I do not see why a data model has any higher requirement for
> business models, use cases and so forth than a language like HTML,
> XLink or XML namespaces. In fact, I would argue that those
> languages always have an implicit data model reflecting implicit
> use cases and business models. We can make the data model explicit
> without making the use models explicit. Isn't that essentially
> what the information set is doing?
I am quite comfortable helping to design a data model for XML, because
XML *as a language* is a closed system; I am not (yet) comfortable
helping to design a data model for the Web in general. Perhaps we
have been misunderstanding each-other.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@m...
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
