• From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>, "'David Megginson'" <david@m...>
• Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 20:42:27 +0200

David Megginson writes:

> Tim Bray writes:
>
> > It is becoming painfully obvious that we need a general-purpose 
> > packaging mechanism to deliver an arbitrary number of related 
> > whatevers along with a piece of XML payload.  There has been a lot
> > of discussion about this around the W3C.  It may be the case that
> > multipart-mime provides a general solution for this problem (don't
> > understand it well enough myself to have an opinion), or perhaps
> > we need an XML Packaging Language to use for this purpose. -Tim
>
> To start with, we need a hub document -- RDF would do:
>
>    [example snipped]
>
> A client could download the hub first, then decide what else it needs.

You might also look at Simon St. Laurent's XML Processing Description Language (XPDL):

   http://www.simonstl.com/projects/xpdl/wd052599.html

It doesn't do everything Tim mentions, but it's a start.

-- Ron Bourret


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C (was Re: XSL Debate, Leventhal responds to Stephen Deach)
• Next by Date: Re: Namespace URI address resources
• Previous by thread: Prior art: using metadata over a communications link
• Next by thread: Re: Packaging and hub documents
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread