[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 23:04:04 -0400

At 06:37 PM 5/20/99 -0700, Tim Bray wrote:
>There's a new issue up over at XML.com which highlights an argument that's
>been going on here and there in private, but never heretofore in public:
>Is XSL a good idea?  

Daggers have been out on the XSL-list on this issue for a good long time.
(See the archives at http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list for too many
details.)  Hakon Wium Lie's "Formatting Objects Considered Harmful"
(http://www.operasoftware.com/people/howcome/1999/foch.html) kicked off
about two weeks of fairly explosive debate about a month ago, but these
issues have been simmering for a long while.

It's wonderful to see XML.com publishing controversial articles, especially
ones whose viewpoint I happen to share. ;-)

(Oops, I used a smiley.  Haven't done that in a long time!)

Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications (June)
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
http://www.simonstl.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member