• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>, "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 11:07:49 -0700

At 12:47 PM 5/31/99 -0500, Paul Prescod wrote:
>> > Using HTTP for URIs sounds intrinsically <em>bad</em> to me.  ...

>Well, the first problem is that it is wrong: it is in violation of IETF
>specifications about the semantics of http: URLs. Personally, I think that
>standards incompliance should be argument enough.

No.  The IETF docs explain how a URI may be used to reference a resource
on the Web.  They further say that URIs are in fact designed to facilitate
this process.  There is nothing in there I've seen stating that they *must*
be so used, nor that they may not be used for other purposes.  Or am
I missing something? -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • RE: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
• Next by Date: RE: Just require URLs
• Previous by thread: RE: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
• Next by thread: RE: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread