• From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>
• To: "Ogievetsky, Nikita" <nikita.ogievetsky@c...>
• Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 14:25:08 +0200

"Ogievetsky, Nikita" wrote:

> Let us say I will start using "xthing:" alias for namespaces
> in my documents. How can I be guarantied that next year
> somebody will not come up with XThing recommendation
> and future versions of XML parsers will make it a reserved word?

By noting that it doesn't start with the letters {x,X}{m,M}{l,L}

> Isn't it against some basic XML principles?

>         6. My suggestion: come up with a new URI scheme that has the same
>         scheme-specific syntax as an http URI but that is only intended as a
> unique
>         identifier.

"urn:namespace:your%20stuff%20here" for example?

--
Chris

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: "Ogievetsky, Nikita" <nikita.ogievetsky@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Omitted selector in CSS2 rulesets
• Next by Date: Re: Topic Navigation Maps...
• Previous by thread: Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Next by thread: RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread