• From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• To: "XML-Dev Mailing list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 22:02:40 +0800

I've just put up a new version of FOP. There is no functional difference
from 0.6.0 as far as the XSL side of things goes. Rather, the way FOP is
invoked has changed. It is now possible to:

* Pass FOP a DOM Document rather than a filename. This makes it possible to
embed FOP in other applications (such as XSLT engines and web servers)

* Use any SAX parser, not just XP as before

I'm really keen to find out if people are able to get FOP working with a DOM
Document (I haven't had time to really test it yet).

see http://www.jtauber.com/fop/

James



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: a schema validator-generator
• Next by Date: RE: Weighing in on XSL / Standards
• Previous by thread: RE: XSL allows better automated program manipulation (Re: Questio ning XSL)
• Next by thread: Lotsa laughs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread