• From: MURATA Makoto <murata@a...>
• To: www-xml-schema-comments@w...
• Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 12:57:50 +0900

Paul Prescod wrote:

>Noah_Mendelsohn/CAM/Lotus@l... wrote:
>> So, depending on how you feel about that analysis of attribute values,
>> pandora's box is then open.  
>
>I can see that the box is open but only a crack.

I agree with Paul.  I personally would like to drop everything that affects 
information sets from the schema language.  Hence, I oppose to information 
set contributions, archetypes, defaults, entities, notations, ....

Cheers,

Makoto
 
Fuji Xerox Information Systems
 
Tel: +81-44-812-7230   Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata@a...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Argh...Entities
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Argh...Entities
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: What is W3C's official position on use of PI?
• Next by Date: Re: What is W3C's official position on use of PI?
• Previous by thread: Re: Argh...Entities
• Next by thread: Re: Argh...Entities
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread