• From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• To: XML List <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 10:41:57 -0700

Regarding the discussion on non-retrievable URIs, you may want to look into
the URN spec, and more generally, at the paper "Naming and Addressing: URIs,
URLs, ... " at http://www.w3.org/Addressing/.

Best wishes,
Andrew Layman
Microsoft

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Overloaded URIs must GO!
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Weighing in on XSL / Standards
• Next by Date: RE: Lotsa laughs
• Previous by thread: Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Next by thread: Overloaded URIs must GO!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread