• From: terje@i... (Terje Norderhaug)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 12:58:03 -0700

At 11:36 AM 5/13/99, roddey@u... wrote:
>I never really had any one say whether they thought that validation that
>included both AND connectors and M to N repetition for any of the connectors is
>feasible (meaning fast and compact and maintainable and verifiable in my
>opinion, but tell me if you disagree.)
>
>Does anyone believe that these can be done in less than brute force tree search
>times?

XML requires deterministic content models. This allows validators to do
their job without having to look more than one element ahead or do brute
force tree searches.

-- Terje <Terje@i...> | Media Design in*Progress

   Software for Mac Web Professionals at <http://www.in-progress.com>
   Take advantage of XML with Emile, the first XML editor for Mac.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Again wit da AND and Repetitions
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Guidelines to describe an User Interface ?
• Next by Date: Re: Singletons in a DTD
• Previous by thread: Re: Again wit da AND and Repetitions
• Next by thread: Re: Again wit da AND and Repetitions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread