Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Chris Lilley wrote: > ISO represents governments, not the international community at large. More exactly, it represents national standards bodies, only some of which are governmental: ANSI, e.g., is a private U.S. nonprofit. > For example. Tibetan is a language, but was not added into ISO 10646 > because Tibet is ruled by China. Do you have evidence for this story? IMHO Tibetan didn't make it into 10646:1993 because it's a hairy script, not because of Chinese interference. (It is now in by amendment). Unicode got involved between DIS-1 and DIS-2, well before the publication of the unamended standard. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@c... You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
