• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 17:52:22 -0700

At 05:29 PM 5/12/99 -0700, Don Park wrote:
>Thanks for clearing that up.  Do you what the folks who "regard PIs as
>problematic second-class syntax" recommend for first-class out-of-band
>signaling mechanism?

You'd have to ask one of them. -T.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: What is W3C's official position on use of PI?
• Next by Date: Re: What is W3C's official position on use of PI?
• Previous by thread: Re: What is W3C's official position on use of PI?
• Next by thread: Parsing content with SAX API
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread