• From: "Mark D. Anderson" <mda@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 10:34:41 -0700

I can see that there needs to be room in the standard to allow
that a namespace URI can be any old thing -- it may or may
not use a "http" scheme, and there may or may not be something
retrievable there, and the thing being retrieved might be
an english document, or a dtd, or a redirect to sex.com.

But it would be great if there were a standard that also
allowed for greater precision, so that one could distinguish
the notions of:
- a URN
- a dtd or xml schema
- an english spec
- a document describing rights for some TBD rights protocol

I've seen all of the above used for namespace URI.

So it seems the situation is being excerbated by the lack
of a standard linking syntax (XLink, RDF) and an associated 
standardized vocabulary for these associations.

-mda



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
• Next by Date: Re: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
• Previous by thread: Re: Just require URLs
• Next by thread: RE: Just require URLs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread