• From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
• To: 'XML Developers' List' <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 17:33:46 +0100

Err ... I might be losing my sanity here, but I
_thought_ I'd posted a description of a technique that
allows us to have the best of all worlds (forwards and 
backwards compatibility with new methods added to 
Parser, and no ugly casting or catching of
NoSuchMethodErrors) in my last contribution to the
'Parser2 considered harmful' thread,

http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/9905/0425.html

Didn't it propagate? Didn't it make sense? I'd be
happy to elaborate if it wasn't all that clear.

Cheers,


Miles

-- 
Miles Sabin                          Cromwell Media
Internet Systems Architect           5/6 Glenthorne Mews
+44 (0)181 410 2230                  London, W6 0LJ
msabin@c...           England

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: SAX2 RFD: Inheritance vs. Modification vs. Amalgamation
• Next by Date: Namespace separators
• Previous by thread: RE: SAX2 RFD: Inheritance vs. Modification vs. Amalgamation
• Next by thread: RE: SAX2 RFD: Inheritance vs. Modification vs. Amalgamation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread