• From: "Julian Reschke" <reschke@m...>
• To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@p...>,<www-xml-schema-comments@w...>,"xml-dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 07:59:23 +0200

> From: owner-xml-dev@i... [mailto:owner-xml-dev@i...]On Behalf Of
> Paul Prescod
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 11:20 PM
> To: www-xml-schema-comments@w...; xml-dev
> Subject: minOccur, maxOccur
>
>
> I dispute the usefulness of minOccur and maxOccur. I would like to hear
> about where people would use these features. I find that people often want
> them but can find a clearer way of expressing their document type when
> they are not available.

Interesting statemen. How about an example. How would you define a schema
where <a> can only contain <b> and <c>, each of which exactly one time?


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: minOccur, maxOccur
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • minOccur, maxOccur
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Benchmark of 6 XML parsers on Solaris
• Next by Date: Re: Redirecting XML files?
• Previous by thread: minOccur, maxOccur
• Next by thread: Re: minOccur, maxOccur
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread