• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• To: "Carl Hage" <carl@c...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 14:43:25 -0400

Hi Carl,

Carl said:
I think the URI identifying namespaces and DTDs should be URLs
not URNs. An XML document without retrievable documentation on
the DTD should be considered non-compliant. The biggest problem
isn't syntax-- it's the semantics. XML validators based on DTDs will
only identify an insignificant percentage of errors-- hardly worth it if
you ask me unless debugging software. (Though considering how
Microsoft and Netscape callously violate HTML standards, I may
need to recant.)

Didier says:
Why should URN usage for name space identification shouldn't be used? Do you
have a good argument against it? If so, let's share it. I have an argument
against URLs: location dependency.

regards
Didier PH Martin
mailto:martind@n...
http://www.netfolder.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Just require URLs
    • From: "Carl Hage" <carl@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Just require URLs
• Next by Date: RE: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
• Previous by thread: Just require URLs
• Next by thread: Re: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread