• From: "Joshua E. Smith" <jesmith@k...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 11:46:39 -0400

I have an element which can contain 0 or more instances of some element
types (call these collections), and 0 or 1 instances of others (call these
singletons), and I don't want to contrain the order.

If I have collections C1, C2, C3
and I have singletons S1, S2, S3

And I declare:

(S1? , S2? , S3? , (C1 | C2 | C3)*)

Then the singletons, if they appear, would have to be in that order and
would have to be first.  So that's not what I want.

I suppose I could declare some combinatorics:

( S1? | S2? | S3? | (S1 , S2)? | (S2 , S1)? | (S1 , S3)? blah blah blah

but I'd have to mix in the C1, C2, C3, etc., too, and I have about 8
singleton classes, so this would quickly get totally out of control.

Am I missing something, or is what I want to describe not really practical
in a DTD?  I'm perfectly comfortable leaving the singletonness out of my
DTD (my application will detect duplication errors anyway), if that's the
only answer.  But if there *is* a way to capture this without waiting for
XSchema to be finished, I'd love to hear it!


-Joshua Smith


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: XLink: behavior must go!
• Next by Date: Aplogies: wrong list!! Please delete immediately
• Previous by thread: archetype refinement and architectural forms
• Next by thread: Re: Singletons in a DTD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread