• From: "Steve Oldmeadow" <smo@j...>
• To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 09:21:46 +0800

----- Original Message -----
From: David Megginson <david@m...>
To: 'XML Dev' <xml-dev@i...>
Sent: 27/05/1999 5:31
Subject: Why Lynx-compatibility matters (was RE: Lotsa laughs)


> Small devices (such as heldhelds and smart cell phones) may do to
> Microsoft in the next decade what PCs did to IBM in the 1980's.  Let's
> start thinking forward a couple of years -- should we be more worried
> more about 3COM than Microsoft?

Don't forget voice as well.  To quote someone from IBM's voice labs "The
telephone is the ultimate thin client".

Steve Oldmeadow - fondly reminiscing about the good old days when I used
Lynx and image maps were few and far between :)



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Lotsa laughs
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • RE: Lotsa laughs
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • Why Lynx-compatibility matters (was RE: Lotsa laughs)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: IMPORTANT: XML Infoset WD
• Next by Date: Re: DTDs
• Previous by thread: RE: Why Lynx-compatibility matters (was RE: Lotsa laughs)
• Next by thread: Re: Lotsa laughs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread