Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Paul Prescod wrote: > Even so, I don't follow your argument. The schema needs to validate that > there is a unparsed entity with a particular name. Why does the > declaration have to be done in the schema? > > It makes perfect sense to me that a *document* should declare what > external resources it needs (through a URL or entity declaration) and that > the *schema* would verify that an element that is supposed to reference a > resource actually does (whether through a URL or entity). Your argument is sound. I am converted. Down with all entity declarations in XSchema! -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@c... You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
