• From: roddey@u...
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 10:46:03 -0600

> According to IBM's alphaworks discussion group, their XML4J parser is
> NOT thread safe. Not sure about other parsers.
>
> Any pointers are appreciated.

See my other response on the related thread. We have chosen what we consider the
correct level of granularity for thread safety, which is at the per-parser
level. I'm discussing the 2.x versions here, Java and C++ are the same in this
respect. We see little use in having multiple threads in a single parser. It is
more appropriate to have a parser per-thread.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Java based XML parsers for server use.
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Thread-safe SAX parsing (was Re: Java based XML parsers for server use.)
• Next by Date: Re: Java based XML parsers for server use.
• Previous by thread: Re: Java based XML parsers for server use.
• Next by thread: Re: Java based XML parsers for server use.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread