• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>, "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 07:57:10 -0700

At 10:20 PM 5/24/99 +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>Dave has mentioned that DSSSL was only partly implemented, but it should
>be emphasized that this does not mean a failure in the DSSSL
>specification:

I couldn't disagree more.  A standard which goes unimplemented is not
only a failed standard but actively damaging, as it weakens the arguments
for standards-based development.  -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: searching for search
• Next by Date: Re: Weighing in on XSL / Standards
• Previous by thread: RE: Weighing in on XSL / Standards
• Next by thread: RE: Weighing in on XSL / Standards
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread