• From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• To: Arthur Rother <arthur.rother@o...>, xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 19:04:48 +0700

Arthur Rother wrote:

> In my case, I don't have to care so much about the size of the parser and I
> found,
> that SP is much faster than expat. Is this true, or must I have made mistakes
> in integrating expat ?

The latter.  Expat is much faster than SP.

James



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Some answers to my questions...
    • From: Arthur Rother <arthur.rother@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Do I need to use a validating parser?
• Next by Date: Can't subclass ElementNode in applet
• Previous by thread: Re: Some answers to my questions...
• Next by thread: LISP + XML [was Re: XML-Conformant Programming Languages]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread