• From: TAMURA Kent <kent@t...>
• To: elharo@m...
• Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 18:21:25 +0900

In message "Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail"
    on 99/04/07, Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...> writes:

> No, I just checked and that still fails in exactly the same way using
> XJParse 1.1.14. For what it's worth this is on Windows NT. It would not be
> out of the question that there are some implicit Unix assumptions in the
> ...

I have found a bug about external entities in XML4J 1.1.16 and
fixed it.

-- 
TAMURA, Kent  @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM Japan

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: 'real' XML data
• Next by Date: Check your namespaced documents
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail
• Next by thread: Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread