• From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@e...>
• To: "'Chris Lilley'" <chris@w...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 09:18:38 -0400

> > I think you'll find the cost of the cached result to be on the same
order
> > (in terms of cost) as dynamically parsing the documents. I have found
that
> > in such cases, basic system call overhead and CPU usage is roughly the
same
> > (open and close calls, a couple of reads).
>
> Thanks for sharing that experience; well, it certainly makes the code
> even easier!

... and more flexible. Cached results are persistent and can get out of
date.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Competition: fast XML parser for charset labelling
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Competition: fast XML parser for charset labelling
• Next by Date: ANNOUNCE: xhtml modularization draft
• Previous by thread: Re: Competition: fast XML parser for charset labelling
• Next by thread: RE: Competition: fast XML parser for charset labelling
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread