• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: chris@w...
• Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 22:52:19 -0400 (EDT)

Chris Lilley scripsit:

> On the contrary; it can suppose that, but having made that supposition
> it can check it. It can parse the document, using the cp-ebcidic-us
> conversion from bytes to characters, and having done so it can look in
> the XML declaration for an encoding declaration, and one of two things
> happen:

Remember that I spoke of a client that *cannot* understand EBCDIC 
(because it has no conversion table, say), but perhaps has the 4-byte
heuristic from Appendix F.

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@c...
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>

• References:
  • Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376
• Next by Date: Re: multiple encoding specs (Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376)
• Previous by thread: Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376
• Next by thread: Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread