• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>
• Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 10:37:55 -0500 (EST)

Jonathan Borden writes:
 > David Megginson wrote:
 > >
 > >There *is* a potentially nasty problem lurking here: the DTD may
 > >contain default values for attributes as well as validation
 > >information.
 > 
 >     If DTDs *were* only for validation...

As was probably clear from the rest of my message, the subject line
was meant to read "DTDs are not just for validation".


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Between raw and cooked II: Are? DTDs are just for validation
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML query language
• Next by Date: Re: Why Doesn't IE5 use the DTD to Validate?
• Previous by thread: Between raw and cooked II: Are? DTDs are just for validation
• Next by thread: RE: Between raw and cooked II: Are? DTDs are just for validation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread