• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 23:06:20 -0400 (EDT)

roddey@u... scripsit:

> I just now, for whatever reason, got around to noticing that the James
> Clark 'valid' tests imply that you can reference an element in a content
> model without its ever having been declared, for instance:

[snippage]

> What am I missing here?

Extensibility.

By allowing unknown element types in content models, we allow
documents to define such element types according to their needs,
using either the internal subset or a containing external DTD,
and then they will "just work" as content of the existing elements.

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@c...
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Yet another validity question
    • From: roddey@u...

• Prev by Date: Re: Yet another validity question
• Next by Date: Re: Yet another validity question
• Previous by thread: Yet another validity question
• Next by thread: Re: Yet another validity question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread