• From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• To: "'John Cowan'" <cowan@l...>, XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 16:40:29 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	John Cowan [SMTP:cowan@l...]
> 
> Paul Langer wrote:
> 
> > One remark on the EBCDIC handling:
> > 
> > Your program returns "EBCDIC-CP-US" if it detects EBCDIC
> > without an explicit encoding declaration (see comment:
> >  /* better than nothing */).
> > 
> > I do not think that this behaviour is "better than nothing".
> 
> In Java I could throw an error, but C doesn't have exception
> handling, and I figure a server would rather return something
> than nothing.  The routine is not meant to handle ill-formed
> XML, and will return one of the other defaults ("UTF-8",
> "UTF-16-BE", "UTF-16-LE") depending on just what bytes it sees.
> 
	If this gets turned into an Apache module it would be better to
return DECLINED and let the next mime sniffer module handle it - that's what
I do in my Apache::MimeXML. I don't think it's a good idea to make
assumptions for invalid XML - just return an error code.

	Just my 2p

	Matt.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: ANNOUNCE: xml encoding detector in C
• Next by Date: XML and Python?
• Previous by thread: Re: ANNOUNCE: xml encoding detector in C
• Next by thread: Yet another validity question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread