• From: Richard Goerwitz <richard@g...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 16:59:20 -0400

andyclar@u... wrote:

> I tried recreating the failures of Elliote's torture test using
> XML4J 2.0.4 and was not able to produce a failure.

Although it's not true in your case, many failures may have nothing to
do with the parsers per se, but rather with system resources.  Validating
ERH's files may require opening enough file descriptors that either the
process hits its own limit - or the system-wide maximum gets reached.

-- 

Richard Goerwitz
PGP key fingerprint:    C1 3E F4 23 7C 33 51 8D  3B 88 53 57 56 0D 38 A0
For more info (mail, phone, fax no.):  finger richard@g...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail
    • From: andyclar@u...

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail
• Next by Date: Refactoring SAX 1.0
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail
• Next by thread: Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread