• From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>
• To: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>, "xml mailing list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 13:24:41 -0500

excellent. one point: there is no reason to define text/xhtml as opposed to
using text/xml and inserting a DOCTYPE  or perhaps a default xmlns
definition. If a user-agent needs to know the DOCTYPE ... look at it!

Jonathan Borden
http://jabr.ne.mediaone.net

>
>
> The new working draft for XHTML is available at
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-html-in-xml-19990224/
>
> Frank
> Frank Boumphrey
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD
    • From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>

• Prev by Date: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD
• Next by Date: RE: More XML Identity Angst
• Previous by thread: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD
• Next by thread: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread