Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
>As far as Namespaces is concerned, the namespace URI is a black box -- >it doesn't point to anything, and it doesn't mean anything. The >creator, however, is free to add internal structure: > > http://www.megginson.com/ns/business/1999-01-29/ > http://www.megginson.com/ns/business/1999-02-09/ > >etc. > But that kind of raises issues regarding extensibility, right? How would you extend a previous version, such that the old one remained intact while the new one was a superset, without having to have them use two different prefixes, in a situation where they both might have to coexist? I haven't thought it out, so maybe its simple, but it seems an obvious issue for us to thrash on for a couple weeks :-) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
