• From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@u...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 12:55:56 -0800

>It also sets an encouraging standard of its own as an open-process spec
>(not just open-source software) that's doing quite well.

Well said.

Rob


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: SAX and Standards Bodies (was Streaming XML?)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. ))
• Next by Date: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999)
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX and Standards Bodies (was Streaming XML?)
• Next by thread: RE: Streaming XML? [was Re: XML Information Set Requirements..]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread