• From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 12:07:17 -0800

Whether my opinion is based on ignorance or optimism,  I have no problem
with using URI for feature names.  As long as people make some effort to
protect ourselves, I think URI will serve our needs.  Common feature names
can be maintained at one sight and some reasonable rules about how to insure
uniqueness.  As far as standards for URI goes, it is my belief that if there
is no standard then there is no great need for the standard.  Please don't
forget to discount by 25% to account for my usual rate of exaggeration.

Lets move on.

Best,

Don Park
Docuverse



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: XML DTD vs. XML-Data
• Next by Date: Office 2000 and XML
• Previous by thread: RE: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd)
• Next by thread: Immediate opening for XSL Pro!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread