• From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• To: "xml-dev@i..." <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 13:24:04 +0100

Richard Anderson wrote:

> In terms of standards, am I right or wrong in thinking that DCD replaced
> XML_Data ?

I said as much in my comparison of the various XML schema languages (see 
http://www.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/DVS1/staff/bourret/bourret.htm). 
 This was based on the statement in the DCD abstract that "The DCD proposal 
incorporates a subset of the XML-Data Submission...", the fact that DCD and 
XML-Data are both from Microsoft (as well as others), and David Megginson's 
statement to that effect 
(http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/9809/0183.html).

> Also, is DCD being replaced by something else ? I remember reading or
> hearing something but I cant remember what.

Eventually, all of the XML schema languages will (hopefully) be replaced by 
the schema language currently being developed by the W3C.

-- Ron Bourret


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Next by Date: Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...
• Previous by thread: Schema Muddle (was Quite Standards Questions)
• Next by thread: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread