• From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• To: "XML List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 09:28:08 -0800

>I know it is available - just as there are tools to build a DOM tree from
>SAX events. I'd just like to see SAX being given an official standing
>_within_ the DOM specs as "the" DOM visitor interface. Ideally, SAX would
be
>part of the DOM specs.


Oren,

Its a nice idea but it conflicts with at least one DOM API requirement:
JavaScript support.  Predicate Functors can be contrived with JavaScript but
not multifacet callback interfaces like SAX.

Don Park



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Next by Date: Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ]
• Previous by thread: Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Next by thread: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread