• From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>
• To: Rob Schoening <rschoening@u...>
• Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 21:07:57 +0000

Rob Schoening wrote:
>
> XML desperately needs an XDK.  Moreover, the XDK's component parts 
> need to be developed as if they were part of a whole.

This would be _wonderful_  for example, SAX and DOM should be 
designed/written so that they are complementary.  So that:

I could do:
     SAX -> DOM -> SAX'   Where Events(SAX') = Events(SAX)
and  DOM -> SAX -> DOM'   Where State(DOM') = State(DOM)

:) Clark

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XDK
    • From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>

• References:
  • RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
    • From: peter@w... (Peter Seibel)
  • RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
    • From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
• Previous by thread: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
• Next by thread: RE: XDK
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread