[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Hi Everyone, I am working my way through the XLink standard (WD 3-Mar-98) and am now confused about the role attribute. Under Link semantics the standard you can specify the role attribute to describe the type of relationship the link describes. However, it caveats this saying that simple links "have an attribute called role that has a different function, they cannot have a role attribute for link semantics." Unfortunately, I have not been able to find in the specification the discussion of the role attribute for a simple link. Unless the standard is talking about the "content-role" attribute but that of course is a different attribute. Also, why use the attribute "role" for link semantics and "role" for Remote resource semantics but then shift gears to "content-role" for local resource semantics? Wouldn't the role of a remote resource also be a "content-role"? One last comment, anyone else get the feeling that there must be a better way to describe the combinations of legal attributes for the various types of links? URLs to tutorials or good papers on this would be appreciated. Thanks, - Mike ----------------------------------------------- Michael C. Daconta Author of Java 2 and JavaScript for C/C++ Programmers Author of C++ Pointers and Dynamic Memory Management Sun Certified Java Programmer and Developer http://www.gosynergy.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



