Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Prud'hommeaux [SMTP:eric@w...] > > On Wed, Feb 24, 1999 at 11:14:14PM -0500, Craig I. Johnson wrote: > > Someone from w3c should complain. > > Pursuant to this, I am charged with collecting a list of XML > generating and using apps and evaluating their conformance with > http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210. The objective is not to > bash any particular vendor, but to create a forum where vendors and > the public may determine what XML applications need attention and what > ones will sail comfortably and interroperably into the next millineum. > > Conformance may be judged on these criteria (any probably more that I > haven't thought of): > > Generates well-formed XML. > Generates valid XML where a DTD is available. > Accepts well-formed/valid XML. > Follows the application rules described in the XML spec: > Produces a valid document tree when processing valid XML. > Produces an empty doc when it observes a fatal error (see > http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210#sec-terminology). > I think most people would be happy with every XML application creating _only_ xml that conforms with the XML spec. That would make me happy anyway - perhaps I'm easily pleased ;-) Matt. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
