• From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 18:38:09 +0800

One (serious) issue that imediately arises out of my XML überdocument system
is that there is a difference in XML between the document entity and other
entities: the existence of the prolog.

If an XML document has a empty prolog, there is no problem because an XML
document entity with an empty prolog is a legal external parsed entity.
However, the moment you have an XML declaration or document type
declaration, the entity can no longer act as an external parsed entity.

James
--
James Tauber / jtauber@j... / www.jtauber.com
Associate Researcher, Electronic Commerce Network
Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia

Maintainer of : www.xmlinfo.com,  www.xmlsoftware.com and www.schema.net




xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?)
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
  • Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?
• Next by Date: Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?)
• Previous by thread: A critique of XML-RPC
• Next by thread: Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread