• From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 19:47:57 -0800

This is not a proposal but a testing of the water to see if there is a wide
enough need for a 'restricted' (some might call it constricted) version of
the "Namespaces for XML" spec (lets call it RNX for now).

Such a spec might dictate that all namespace declarations be at the root
element (XML fragments are problematic but...).  This restriction has the
side effect of not allowing duplicate prefixes.

Comments?

Don Park
Docuverse



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML
    • From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Next by Date: Re: What is a good database for very large collections?
• Previous by thread: XML parsing techniques
• Next by thread: Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread