• From: "Jeff Greif" <jmg@t...>
• To: "XML Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 11:52:27 -0800

The minimal XHTML document used as an example in the WD is missing the the
prolog PI
<?xml version="1.0" ?>

Is this somehow accounted for by specifying the MIME type as text/xhtml?
Or is this an oversight?

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The new working draft for XHTML is available at
>> > >
>> > > http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-html-in-xml-19990224/
>> > >
>> > > Frank
>> > > Frank Boumphrey
>> > >
>> >
>> >



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Question about New XHTML WD
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD)
• Next by Date: RE: Documents and Document Fragments
• Previous by thread: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD
• Next by thread: Re: Question about New XHTML WD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread