• From: Rob Schoening <Rschoening@u...>
• To: tyler@i...,xml-dev@i...,matthew.sergeant@e...
• Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 01:13:53 -0800

>The transaction processing
>companies will have their work cut out for them performing hundreds of
>transactions a second using XML. That's all I'm saying. How they get around
>that is their business. (it might even be my business in the near future,
>just not now).

  I don't think this is such a big deal.  It seems like it would be trivial
to load-balance the XML component of the server.  There would be a slight
increase in latency to account for XML parsing, but it wouldn't drag the
database.  It's not as if the XML processing must be done in lock-step with
the transaction processing.

Rob

>
>	Matt.
>
>xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
>Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
>To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
>(un)subscribe xml-dev
>To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
>subscribe xml-dev-digest
>List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
>
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Interesting Monday.
    • From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Interesting Monday.
• Next by Date: Re: SAX: Next Round (Lexical Event Handler)
• Previous by thread: RE: Interesting Monday.
• Next by thread: RE: Interesting Monday.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread