• From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• To: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 10:04:18 +0800

>Why not have "from here on use these declarations" as the default behavior
>and then introduce 'push' and 'pop' constructs?  'push' would save current
>declaration settings and the 'pop' would just restore to the saved
settings.


Could do. If this were the case, I wouldn't use attributes as they would
confuse the scope issue. Better to use PIs or empty elements in some
namespace.

James


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999)
• Next by Date: Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999)
• Previous by thread: Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. ))
• Next by thread: Re: More XML Identity Angst
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread