• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 17:06:40 -0500

Nathan Kurz wrote:

> And if the stream is continuous (for example, an XML
> stock ticker) even the concept of a well-formed stream seems tenuous.

It's not clear that XML supports infinitely long streams (where the
end-tag of the document element is *never* reached).

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Streaming XML? [was Re: XML Information Set Requirements..]
    • From: Tim.Shaw@w...
  • RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999
    • From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>

• References:
  • Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999
    • From: Nathan Kurz <nate@v...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Confusion about conditional sections
• Next by Date: RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999
• Next by thread: RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread