• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 13:15:10 -0500

Oren Ben-Kiki wrote:

> [T]he
> DOM specs should provide a standard way to apply a SAX visitor to a DOM
> (sub)tree. A parser would be just a special case of an application which has
> an internal "virtual DOM tree" and doesn't provide random access to it.

See http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/XML/DOMParser.java for code that does
just this: it walks a org.w3c.dom.Document and fires SAX events
based on its contents.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
    • From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of FiddlyBits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Next by Date: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of FiddlyBits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of FiddlyBits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Next by thread: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread